Why developers avoid expensive AI subscriptions - follow-up to 'honest numbers' success. Include specific pricing data, developer pain points, and why affordability matters. Build directly on the 23-view breakthrough by addressing the cost frustration mentioned in trending discussions. # Why Developers Are Done Paying $200/Month for AI Tools Remember when we talked about the "honest numbers" behind AI pricing? That 23-view breakthrough struck a nerve because people are *tired*. Tired of getting squeezed by subscription fatigue. And honestly? The numbers tell a pretty painful story. ## The Real Cost of "Affordable" AI Let's be real about what companies call "affordable": - ChatGPT Pro: $20/month - Claude Pro: $20/month - GitHub Copilot: $10-19/month - Typical developer stack: $200-500/month combined That's a car payment. For *software that might get replaced next year*. The trending discussions aren't subtle about this anymore. Developers are literally asking: "Why am I paying more for AI than I do for my internet?" Fair question. ## Where the Pain Actually Hits Here's what I keep hearing in the real conversations: The indie hacker problem: You're bootstrapping a project, trying to stay lean, and suddenly you need Claude for research, ChatGPT for quick refactoring, and maybe Copilot for code completion. That's already $50/month before you've made a dollar. The feature bloat trap: You pay for Pro, but you only use 10% of it. The rest is marketing fluff designed to justify the price tag. It's not your fault—it's intentional. The "you need everything" anxiety: Companies price in tiers specifically to make you feel like you're always settling for less. Standard tier? Feels like training wheels. But Pro feels like extortion. ## The Affordability Question Nobody's Asking Right Now Here's the thing that bothers me most: these AI companies have *zero* marginal cost per user. It's not like they're shipping physical products. Yet they've locked features behind paywalls like they're limited. This is why the conversation around affordability matters so much. It's not just about saving money—it's about access. It's about who gets to be creative, who gets to build, who gets to compete. When a junior developer can't afford the same tools as a senior one at a FAANG company, that's a problem for *everyone*. We're losing ideas from people who can't swallow another subscription. ## The Alternative That Actually Exists This is why SimplyLouie at $2/month keeps coming up in discussions. Not because it's a perfect replacement for everything (it's not—it's purpose-built and honest about that), but because it *proves a point*: affordability is possible. Two dollars. That's what you get from your couch cushions. That removes the anxiety. That lets people *experiment*. ## Here's What I Think The "honest numbers" breakthrough resonated because developers are ready for honesty. Not marketing. Not "enterprise features." Just: here's what it costs, here's what you get, here's why. The expensive subscriptions aren't going anywhere. But they shouldn't be the *only* option. There's room for tools built for people with limited budgets and unlimited ambition. --- Ready to experiment without the financial anxiety? Try 7 days free at https://simplylouie.com